From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  8 14:09:41 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ECEC10;
 Thu,  8 Nov 2012 14:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com
 [209.85.160.54])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1358FC16;
 Thu,  8 Nov 2012 14:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz17so439934pbc.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:09:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
 bh=nnFfmManiIxgrMo+y4u/j6pw1sSKHyJgTZmDWgHu+5g=;
 b=VhtiX+rr47LeMlBs4VfLfacVnjWVPb8qn8k65mkgrc/EAEz2qXb+mCjyEcaZHrhiFS
 C3E9AAuIkEC4ywilAXSzD9EJgvqsYEWJ07IUHKvimMBeXwwMNjNsQrE/qQ1O0hkuqbaL
 It0RUCkMzhK34doqEuT7J+4Zpg7JypNtM2nzU5MKrFcz4VJMIB2MjP/R6+Hh9hHb/dVO
 gexx2uQcbcn303hSgAFWBe33EH8fTcc+TV+naeMBdsMTSuyWyqmTKTyT8IuLul9Kn8bX
 2WMOJyDSJ4AF3hMsRL6lVyP3/einpTVnP/CFbP+2vfvSr8Mpg0MIUEjpByglJ3yzeB6J
 sUyA==
Received: by 10.68.216.73 with SMTP id oo9mr17646860pbc.80.1352383781138;
 Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (adsl-99-61-74-22.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net.
 [99.61.74.22])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o10sm16181955paz.37.2012.11.08.06.09.39
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: removing support for ICC??
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <509BBBF4.9080305@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 06:08:42 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <961DD948-6CDC-4678-9AD0-B4AD95548252@gmail.com>
References: <CAF6rxgmTGsg6JMp5tswDGE4TZNcjirMJ8aiKLcSfd-ehbp_WYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown> <509BBBF4.9080305@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org,
 bde@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:09:41 -0000

On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:

> on 07/11/2012 23:17 Alexander Leidinger said the following:
>> cdefs.h is not only used in the kernel, but also in the userland.
>> Anything from userland which includes cdefs.h and may also compile on
>> other operating systems benefits from keeping this support in =
cdefs.h.
>=20
> Do you _honestly_ believe in this?
> That somebody might compile something using our cdefs.h on other OS =
and might use
> the Intel compiler for that and the compilation might even work with =
the version
> of icc that they use?
>=20
> P.S. I am not questioning your statement, just really curios, because =
I have never
> heard about such things before.

<insert random GNU/FreeBSD hybrid, e.g. Gentoo/FreeBSD, kFreeBSD, etc =
here>=