From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 12 12:31:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6CC1437B401; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3850843F75; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3CJVHd0025786;
	Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:31:19 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:41 PDT."
             <0a2201c30128$30e43e50$52557f42@errno.com> 
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:31:17 +0200
Message-ID: <25785.1050175877@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:31:28 -0000

In message <0a2201c30128$30e43e50$52557f42@errno.com>, "Sam Leffler" writes:
>> Second, I have discussed this particular change with ken@,
>> who as you correctly point out is the maintainer, and he
>> agreed that the function was unused.
>>
>
>Then why wasn't ken@ referenced in your commit msg?

Because I forgot.  (See my .sig)

>> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here,
>> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future.
>
>Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o
>consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did.

I could maybe be persuaded that somebody might respond.

I certainly cannot see why one would respond "as Nate did".

At the very least I'd expect them to check the basic facts first.

And as I have understood it, core@ would expect them to keep a
a significantly less confrontational style than Nate did.

But maybe that's just me...

Poul-Henning

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.