From owner-oi-users Mon Feb 27 13:20:41 1995 Return-Path: oi-users-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA06250 for oi-users-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:20:41 -0800 Received: from relay3.UU.NET (relay3.UU.NET [192.48.96.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA06243 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:20:37 -0800 Received: from uucp3.UU.NET by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP id QQyeyf09063; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:19:55 -0500 Received: from wfg.UUCP by uucp3.UU.NET with UUCP/RMAIL ; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:19:52 -0500 Received: from deathray.wfg.com by wfg.com (4.1/wfg1) id AA26155; Mon, 27 Feb 95 15:07:28 CST Received: by deathray.wfg.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA19303; Mon, 27 Feb 95 15:07:20 CST From: kenk@deathray.wfg.com (Ken Konecki) Message-Id: <9502272107.AA19303@deathray.wfg.com> To: oi-users@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Lost focus callback Reply-To: kenk@wfg.com Date: 27 Feb 1995 14:57:09 -0600 Sender: oi-users-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I inadvertently deleted the original message, but the question was can anything be done to change the order of callbacks (i.e. can the lost focus callback be called before the menu callback). The answer is probably not, if OI is using focus out events to trigger the focus leave callback. While I can be certain without throwing an xev on the window, the X server is most likely sending out the mouse click event before the focus out event. -- Ken Konecki kenk@wfg.com -or- ...!uunet!wfg!kenk "One does not seriously attack the expertise of a scientist using the undefined phrase 'butt-head'"