From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 19 13:37:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCA337B405 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397EA43F18 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:37:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsouch@free.fr) Received: from armor.fastether (nas-cbv-7-62-147-153-16.dial.proxad.net [62.147.153.16]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 90BAAC166 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 6970 invoked by uid 1001); 19 Jan 2003 21:51:29 -0000 Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:51:29 +0100 From: Nicolas Souchu To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Newbusifying kbd? Message-ID: <20030119225129.A6948@armor.fastether> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Has anyone already thought about newbusifying kbd? I'm currently working on that part and need a different instance of the kbd.c code. By newbus implementation, I imagine having kbd a parent of atkbd, ukbd... Each instance of kbd would have different kbdsw, keyboards(...) data. The tree of parent-childs would be started by syscons and genkbd. I have currently duplicated kbd.c with different symbol names :( Thoughts? Nicholas -- Nicholas Souchu - nsouch@free.fr - nsouch@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message