From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 3 15:52:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D54106568B; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk [80.68.91.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D058FC2A; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2394E48A58; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:52:24 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbNQqYa12yaT; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:52:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rita.nodomain (unknown [192.168.205.6]) by tomjudge.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A24348A78; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4AF05177.7030705@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:51:19 +0000 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Weldon S Godfrey 3 References: <200911030937.11619.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pieter de Goeje , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0 - network stack crashes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:52:25 -0000 Weldon S Godfrey 3 wrote: > > > If memory serves me right, sometime around 9:37am, Pieter de Goeje told me: > >> Are you perhaps using em(4)? There was an mbuf leak in the driver, >> which was fixed recently. >> You can check mbuf usage with netstat -m. >> > > we are using onboard NICs on the Dell using the bce driver. We did try > several times to see if using an intel PCIexpress card using the em > driver, and we had the same symptoms. > > Could the bce driver have the same leak? The bce driver does not have a memory leak, it does however have a bug which causes memory fragmentation leading to denied mbuf allocation. There is a work around for this in current, you can get the patch like this: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/ You need to put options BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT In your kernel to enable the work arround. Tom