Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 18:27:52 +1000 From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd.org> Cc: postmaster@freebsd.org,questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postmaster Team responsibilities (was: How do I get a new freebsd- mailing list made) Message-ID: <F2EE7776-85B6-4248-9C0A-05D6CAB093C0@nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <4dddf05c-4c8b-770c-31e2-2321774aea9a@freebsd.org> References: <CAGBxaXkn=eG%2BozQAqt6Vi2zw37gva9JHdXYjFNMyg94_vXoM6g@mail.gmail.com> <cdae89a0-3070-1637-1166-371e776d06ee@freebsd.org> <F0D85CD2-3E1D-4F65-B707-61AA6FF24CB2@nimnet.asn.au> <4dddf05c-4c8b-770c-31e2-2321774aea9a@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 April 2023 5:04:32 am AEST, Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@freebsd=2Eorg= > wrote: > On 22/04/2023 18:48, Ian Smith wrote: > > In the olden days, one would email postmaster@freebsd=2Eorg for > advice=2E >=20 > For reference: /Postmaster Team/ responsibilities are at=20 > <https://www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/administration/#t-postmaster>=2E >=20 > Gut feeling (without me asking the Team): it probably makes sense to > be=20 > certain of the requirement for a new list, before seeking advice from > the Team=2E To minimise to-ing and fro-ing=2E Oh, certainly=2E So far I've seen two people discuss the possibility, whi= ch seems too few to yet be considered a groundswell =2E=2E=2E > HTH >=20 > postmaster@ if any of you are reading, please correct me if I'm wrong > :-) Again old-fashioned, I've used another traditional trick (a cc) to make su= re :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F2EE7776-85B6-4248-9C0A-05D6CAB093C0>