From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 21:55:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3CD16A4D3; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:55:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DBD43D2D; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr2so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.178])2003)) with ESMTP id <0I0Y00HIISE1O1@l-daemon>; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:44:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150]) by pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I0Y00LLUSE1MWQ0@pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca>; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:44:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk (S0106006067227a4a.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.233.42])2003)) with ESMTP id <0I0Y0017ESDZNE@l-daemon>; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:44:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:12 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca (Unverified) To: John Baldwin Message-id: <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <200407161557.i6GFvGWg003796@repoman.freebsd.org> <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_prot.c src/sys/sys systm.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:55:35 -0000 At 12:42 16/07/2004, John Baldwin wrote: >On Friday 16 July 2004 11:57 am, Colin Percival wrote: >> Log: >> Add a SUSER_RUID flag to suser_cred. This flag indicates that we want to >> check if the *real* user is the superuser (vs. the normal behaviour, >> which checks the effective user). > >Could we rename PRISON_ROOT to SUSER_PRISONOK or some such to be consistent? I'd be happy to do this; should I simply add the new name, or should I make the substitution across the entire tree? Colin Percival