Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:45:20 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.dev>, freebsd current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Current panics on connecting disks to a LSI-3108 controller Message-ID: <a31155f7-b357-b13c-8e33-e04538651960@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <80510d48-adfe-3f9c-a7cd-81a7e88d9d71@digiware.nl> References: <1406943a-6028-26ae-012f-e83903f2b299@digiware.nl> <266ce56a-0d95-b61a-4757-4ccdc2533ae2@yuripv.dev> <80510d48-adfe-3f9c-a7cd-81a7e88d9d71@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/07/2020 03:39, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > And what I read from the manual page, mrsas plays even nicer with CAM which is a > plus. If by "nicer" you mean that mfi does not integrate with CAM at all, then you are right :-) Also, last I looked mfi has some pretty serious bugs in its direct interface to GEOM. We've seen all kinds of crashes with mfi at work. Whatever the reason why mrsas is not always preferred over mfi, it must pretty nebulous like POLA for existing users. From technical point of view, mrsas appears to be superior. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a31155f7-b357-b13c-8e33-e04538651960>