From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 4 22:52:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id WAA18691 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA18686 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with UUCP id HAA28102; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 07:46:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.3/8.8.2) with SMTP id HAA03028; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 07:19:16 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 07:19:16 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm To: Paul Traina cc: Ollivier Robert , CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: news/lib - lib/news ??? In-Reply-To: <199612050459.UAA01798@precipice.shockwave.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Paul Traina wrote: > There's a large installed base of inn users that will get screwed the next > time they upgrade if you do this. Given that inn is the dominant news system > and /explicitly changed/ to follow this new format, I think you're making > a mistake trying to move backwards in time. > > If that's not enough, I *like* the inn directory layout. Inn is a standalone > subsystem. Yes, thats also my point of view ! In all cases. -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<