From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 28 14:42:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA00450 for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 14:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from staff1.texas.net (ed@staff1.texas.net [206.127.0.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA00440 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 14:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ed@localhost) by staff1.texas.net (TxNet/8.7.5) with SMTP id QAA28834; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:21:35 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: staff1.texas.net: ed owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:21:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Edward Henigin To: Terry Lambert cc: Michael Smith , jkh@time.cdrom.com, phk@critter.tfs.com, stesin@gu.kiev.ua, angio@aros.net, squid-users@nlanr.net, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD malloc.c, -lmalloc, and squid. In-Reply-To: <199608281956.MAA27334@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This stuff all seems pretty cool.. 'cept it doesn't really seem squid related. May I respectfully suggest that further e-mails on this subject *not* include the squid-users list? Please edit your headers in future mail. Regards, Ed -- On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Terry Lambert wrote: > The tentative implementation I was favoring used the following model: > > 1) Process logical names > [...]