From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 9 8:50: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E918037B66C for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA16225; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:50:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010091550.IAA16225@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: ports/21863: Port update: devel/perforce Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/21863; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: sam@inf.enst.fr Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/21863: Port update: devel/perforce Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 18:42:09 +0300 On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:29:23PM +0200, sam@inf.enst.fr wrote: > > >Number: 21863 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: Port update: devel/perforce [snip] > PORTNAME= perforce > -PORTVERSION= 99.2 > +PORTVERSION= 00.1 > CATEGORIES= devel This version 'unbump' sounds like a very likely candidate for a PORTEPOCH=1 to me.. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence no verb. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message