Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:51:56 -0800
From:      Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist
Message-ID:  <589b8dc3-f216-89b1-6de8-0c0391241c2f@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171122165939.GC2442@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
References:  <1f4579f2-7e1c-09b0-e00b-00965ebd1338@freebsd.org> <20171122165939.GC2442@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/22/17 08:59, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or
> multi-packages?  If so, they you probably want to keep the current
> plist.  If not, then I guess it depends on your confidence that the port
> will remain well behaved.


Flavors and multi-packages will work fine with autoplist. autoplist 
always generates the plist according to the currently selected options.


Well-behavedness is what is really required for autoplist.


Yuri




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?589b8dc3-f216-89b1-6de8-0c0391241c2f>