Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:51:56 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist Message-ID: <589b8dc3-f216-89b1-6de8-0c0391241c2f@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20171122165939.GC2442@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <1f4579f2-7e1c-09b0-e00b-00965ebd1338@freebsd.org> <20171122165939.GC2442@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/22/17 08:59, Brooks Davis wrote: > Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or > multi-packages? If so, they you probably want to keep the current > plist. If not, then I guess it depends on your confidence that the port > will remain well behaved. Flavors and multi-packages will work fine with autoplist. autoplist always generates the plist according to the currently selected options. Well-behavedness is what is really required for autoplist. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?589b8dc3-f216-89b1-6de8-0c0391241c2f>