From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 7 10:40:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA29801 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 10:40:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA29796 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 10:40:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA18756; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:40:39 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19981207113952.0421bbd0@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 11:40:23 -0700 To: Eivind Eklund , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Question regarding Linux emulation In-Reply-To: <19981207131035.H13839@follo.net> References: <4.1.19981206215315.042becc0@127.0.0.1> <4.1.19981206215315.042becc0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:10 PM 12/7/98 +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote: >Your speed-penalty will only be measurable if you're doing >benchmarking of syscall overhead. Real-world Linux binaries will >usually run faster under FreeBSD than under Linux, due to the better >VM system. You're coming dangerously close to saying that FreeBSD is "a better Linux than Linux." ;-) --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message