From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun May 22 23:05:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE36B3B457 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 23:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225671E0B; Sun, 22 May 2016 23:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4MN4ueW052424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 May 2016 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4MN4uxW052423; Sun, 22 May 2016 16:04:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 16:04:55 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Ian Lepore Cc: Ulrich Grey , freebsd-arm Subject: Re: upgrading arm6hf Message-ID: <20160522230455.GA48692@www.zefox.net> References: <20160520231622.GI1049@www.zefox.net> <20160521002859.GJ1049@www.zefox.net> <1463795214.1180.351.camel@freebsd.org> <20160521021227.GK1049@www.zefox.net> <1463797063.1180.354.camel@freebsd.org> <20160521023515.GA15151@bluezbox.com> <20160521155043.GM1049@www.zefox.net> <1463849864.1180.364.camel@freebsd.org> <20160521184422.GN1049@www.zefox.net> <1463953014.1180.395.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1463953014.1180.395.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 23:05:02 -0000 Hi Ian, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 03:36:54PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > I tracked this down today and just committed the fix as r300438. The > problem was that MACHINE_CPUARCH was being set to 'armhf' instead of > 'arm' because the translation for 'hf' suffix was removed from > share/sys.mk. We'll need to leave that translation in place for a few > months until everyone running self-hosted armv6hf systems have had a > chance to update. > > So now the build with TARGET_ARCH=armv6 should work. There is probably > some subset of what's in obj/ that could be deleted to avoid a full > rebuild, but I don't know what it is for sure, I just deleted > everything and started over. My build is not done yet, but it has > gotten further than it did last night, so this fix is looking good so > far. I've emptied /usr/obj and the build seems to be running. Holding my breath....8-) What's the likely scenario for upgrading pre-hf systems to post-hf? bob prohaska