From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 11 23:25:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911C016A41F for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AAE43D46 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jABNPJAt006472; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:25:20 -0800 From: Frank Jahnke To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20051111232132.GA15846@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1131749651.96238.50.camel@localhost> <20051111230713.GA1628@xor.obsecurity.org> <1131750571.96238.55.camel@localhost> <20051111232132.GA15846@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FMJ & Associates Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:20:23 -0800 Message-Id: <1131751223.96238.63.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: doug@polands.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:25:21 -0000 On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:21 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > I've read on other boards about the same issue (see > > http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I > > upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I > > mentioned without issues. > > OK, but you're still wrong :-) > > Kris If you are talking about the tag designations, you're right, but it worked for me! I also remember something in the release notes about this, I think... Frank