From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 14 16: 4:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from shell.reiteration.net (pc-62-31-233-77-se.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.233.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F102437B40A for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from reiteration.net (ying.reiteration.net [192.168.1.7]) by shell.reiteration.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9EN4pq01019 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:04:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd-lists@i-zone.demon.co.uk) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:03:27 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Postmater Default Mailbox Reply-To: John Subject: Re: named problem References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011014170019.02ef9fd8@mail.Go2France.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20011014170019.02ef9fd8@mail.Go2France.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <5.1.0.14.0.20011014170019.02ef9fd8@mail.Go2France.com>, Len Conrad writes >This is standard W2K behavior, nothing at all to with whatever version of FBSD >or DNS you run. arrrgh I might have known! > >In W2K tcp/ip advanced setting, uncheck "register with DNS". If you don't every >W2K machine will attempt updating DNS forever, because the DNS never ACKs the >update. Thank you very much, it would have taken an age to suss that one out on my own. i have to admit I haven't seen the error before, though, which is why I initially thought it was to do the upgrade. Perhaps the new system is logging things more effectively. thanks again. very speedy reply! -- John - freebsd-lists@i-zone.demon.co.uk - jfm@reiteration.net http://www.reiteration.net/~jfm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message