From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 19:43:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FB416A404 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from djdexter@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94813C468 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from djdexter@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so462324ugh for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YbYdWVHTiGKgSDqri3gkVpdLqEvmZUBlFosZSwivuLgxRgkPbr5dLYIj8JUgUENfz78Cd8RAWe9uZc0eqcNM2KdrFra2mNHb9SiZ2Ln56icfmYbq4ET4oBJHEk0o9aMomnkTkRMPBk0QdIMEojRAoKdyAKf9Q17+sUv+JPOjyfw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Um+Q9UpPPeFRHJJqP7lYGytmO/i9q8+Mbdlnd/dikPWEzwtM2DPb8rVVjQk6uVipCd6KrfSS2TbXBupRKsVetrpC6i4WRBqOMw2J0Ar+T8ROVTbqoDKkccQUVCpx1xYbCkzY6BgyoC2oQA5kVctLKw8ONJP91JfhwjVlRhLrKqI= Received: by 10.82.155.10 with SMTP id c10mr1371537bue.1173987213898; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.108.4 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:33:33 -0400 From: dex To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0703141410n63874da3lf4b4b2ba5fe90d87@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0A8464C8-EC5B-4276-8EDC-E5348F99806D@messier.com> <8e10486b0703141250i5e016058pbc5f6370144fa5c1@mail.gmail.com> <20070314215033.E29424@chylonia.3miasto.net> <8e10486b0703141410n63874da3lf4b4b2ba5fe90d87@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: per-interface default routes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:35 -0000 On 3/14/07, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > On 3/14/07, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > yes. but ipfw is most universal having all needed things at one place. > > firewalling, routing, shaping, etc. > > PF too. is all at same place. And pf has nat built-in, so it runs in kernel space.