From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 08:34:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAAFC5E for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EAC4EC7 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51C615B3BD21; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:34:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:34:22 -0800 From: David Benfell To: jd1008 Subject: Re: why would I get a segmentation fault on one system but not the other? Message-ID: <20150222083422.GA41895@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150221224006.GA5501@home.parts-unknown.org> <09da5ec0816e098badc49432c802dc18@sdf.org> <390c4c0547fc27e91d28872d29aa2e04@sdf.org> <54E91FA7.2030900@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54E91FA7.2030900@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:34:23 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 05:15:35PM -0700, jd1008 wrote: > >> > Any kernel crashes on the system where apache is segfaulting? No. From that perspective, the system has been rock solid. I've now been running the memtest for over five hours (completing three passes), with zero errors. I'm planning to let it run overnight, which seems to be the consensus on the superuser stackexchange forum. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU6ZSOAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr0xAQAJUZt1BD1TWckbgP6iHnKLip oAlWgHM9TpAv2WHArp7uTo3O4MtKtt3rXmAarNRXLrqOXjZ1eAUaqK2jF+UvefAk u/qRz57/wWRLhEorvnyatnDOVTO8Nux/I68pSkOq48WVfeALvAotKhrTNqHpqPHA 3Bq5oPS05Z0NDYlaeRqmxEzOlK/IjgZoIQUynX5MwKQDzdqGPcB14rekoI19ddbR 7BEP4/vTdAT68DQCIIuGv2bYYVrHXQjHNyZ37HJ8nMy0SL9pZE59VkUnL/OvXu0Z K3j8I0Cs7TcGRqXXVoOpoK9MiHzlG92RhiCMBd/igUYqbG+/NUoovgLk8dwww2XL peks9EgjpboH2Zkr9PXBylapjnjeMKj60JSvTi69QAl7ErTtNWflUDYVx0mTNMdI ZfKCa+bW5nNdTuMa3PCczWTVjTAPMTQaoNJ/CDMpQQVWbNFD8T5230C4TQ/XuqDt BoaSo7C0T1pHXehh8mX8+b9S7iPjXqkdLwIU4bU/qk+W0Uni/jh2+NHk3yRCVk4z uYYamT1nK+tZHx0N5trFLtVrOayrW3rlfMKLdEbAM2eytbhcdCG6jMgq7NtFPdON o+p0diBZGqalLlr77Oc0/B9sdnxisqOKzOOo54akLiOr/kKmgtKjXHI5Ehy+9lql CoHFGTQ5oo1FYaip3b3s =rL3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--