From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 27 16:22:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from DF-INET-1.dogfoodinternet.com (df-inet1.exchange.microsoft.com [131.107.8.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB0937B4C5 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from df-virus2.platinum.corp.microsoft.com ([172.30.236.33]) by DF-INET-1.dogfoodinternet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:01:03 -0700 Received: from 172.30.236.11 by df-virus2.platinum.corp.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:01:42 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Received: from DINO.platinum.corp.microsoft.com ([172.30.236.100]) by yuri.dns.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:01:42 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C04069.DEC25102" Subject: RE: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:01:41 -0700 Message-ID: <5B90AD65A9E8934987DB0C8C0762657401D42BFD@DF-BOWWOW.platinum.corp.microsoft.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD) Thread-Index: AcBAYYRv2TnjaFLORzOg22lBbUiJXAACEImQ From: "Dave Thaler" To: "Brian Zill" , "f.johan.beisser" , "Brad Huntting" Cc: , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2000 23:01:42.0392 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF075F80:01C04069] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C04069.DEC25102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Zill writes: > Aren't two interoperating implementations a requirement for Proposed > Standard? No, I believe it's a requirement for *Draft* Standard. -Dave ------_=_NextPart_001_01C04069.DEC25102 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD)

Brian Zill writes:
> Aren't two interoperating implementations a = requirement for Proposed
> Standard?

No, I believe it's a requirement for *Draft* = Standard.

-Dave

------_=_NextPart_001_01C04069.DEC25102-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message