From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 13 13:06:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77332A03BE9 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC531BDB for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Zb6zB-000CRE-0E for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:06:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:06:24 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150913130624.GR36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911192801.GM36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150912090128.GN36682@home.opsec.eu> <55F4E408.6010204@freebsd.org> <20150913085345.GO36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150913104015.GQ36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150913104015.GQ36682@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:06:25 -0000 Hi! > > I'll change the creation of the .a files and report back. > > The build progresses until the "final" link. > > There are still a few unresolved references. Like this in src/arch/io/timer/timer_signal_provider.cc: evp.sigev_notify_thread_id = _gettid(); which is linux-specific. I'm trying to understand whether this can be replaced by pthread_self() somehow. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !