From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jul 15 7: 5:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from ayukawa.aus.org (ayukawa.aus.org [199.166.246.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD851556E for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 07:04:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lh@aus.org) Received: from PHOENIX.ZER0.NET (lh@PHOENIX.ZER0.NET [199.166.246.189]) by ayukawa.aus.org (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA18075 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:02:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199907151402.KAA18075@ayukawa.aus.org> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:02:47 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: lh@aus.org From: Luke To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -------------Original message follows---------------------- This only lends credence to the fact that one OS can't do it all. If other OS decide to put more effort into threads (or, if FreeBSD remains below par comparitively), then in the future when Apache is threaded in the public releases, then those other OS will be a better platform for webserving under Apache. This will still leave FreeBSD as the undisputed champion of, for example, FTP serving. And QNX for embedded systems. Etc. ___________________________________________________________ I don't know the technical aspects of threads or most of this discussion, but as someone who tries to use FreeBSD wherever possible, It would be disappointing if I had to start recommending another OS because apache runs better on it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message