From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 10 22:13:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0A16A4CE for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:13:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1156A43D2D for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:13:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2066169A40; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:13:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:13:40 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu Message-Id: <20041010181340.1f26e12c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20041010215036.99359.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041010164435.3ccdd0e0.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20041010215036.99359.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: idfubar@yahoo.com Subject: Re: out of i-nodes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:13:43 -0000 Rishi Chopra wrote: > -- Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Don't wrap machine generated output, it makes your > > email a PITA to decipher. > > As long as we're on the subject of ettiquette, don't > include your replies on top of messages like a > dumbshmuck n00b. > > Question still stands; I apologize for text wrapping > of some email clients. You didn't read the entire email, and you snipped away the answer when you replied. I put the formatting note at the top of the message, because it wasn't really related to the message content itself. This could be argued in circles as to whether it's good or bad formatting practice, but I don't care to argue it today. If enough people jump down my throat who believe it's bad practice, I'll change it, but you're the first that's complained in many years. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com