From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 08:44:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984182EA156 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PJjh23Khz47Sq for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1589618660; bh=xlyA3BN1MA3SBF3umfOUIXrm/juXv8Fl7Jam0Mw9AHg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JXPz0k8UrwQ76LxVkiRLX4MXtQmocb8ZhcJREWKOaVVXNT8pt4QJMcCvFqAD9zQ+G SsTrVrnmbqYuXcIPPa63OsFaVmmtkjcCFHapKkyJ4T4GWdQM8WQ5YjiH8dvAjMx/HJ J1odL7InANHQYJl5okGCjH5lLE8vcpf1bKDsYAq0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.71.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M1Hdw-1jX8LG1mcU-002sPT; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:44:20 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" Subject: Re: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal? Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: <15810795.vxEf1mJfsr@walrus.pepperland> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:K0im4oSC4tyJGr77iRbU9VH4P5Ag2bL36vQ38OTboKVONVZUm5s ysO1R2B/gK8mgnroyM0amrlUtXbLiZVAQ6OgjY5A699rQXTN9nr4+PiExDvbHxod03QyGHQ P2CwwufG1miDxQpvZUSrvUtgeYPTCUmLtFEi6lfKIzrDT3fIUhuzopXh6vHngvHs/b/Vst6 bO1KFTuOl2Ve9/+8Pd4pg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Tv8tciTGRnw=:If1amTFXYj8Y22Zi3xETpH M5hsFWWV3X76WmZDH+cz0tgCnD2QPiTeKxCK8s0tY4vUQSZ8g5BZ5ihJkWrVREjcPVNDDzhEy hHVItoqpqNa9XD5q7wf1zVGxpC2SWc7K3NbRYWToj8xBwFl49nHnDd3LcgPtJkAkaQez6YYYq rv0xILpaAjgm/rvS4PlRE0PB1QBIqMMYZujR231JUc3oAWq/X63sk6f6ZbziqEs1T3sjPjSMV MpydsXyHAY6InymlUaJGhZR5vOyCkgmPWSWpV2EnJkHqrchPU8cFvGkyZhEUH2Vi9CAOhk0kT q59wll3ZaY0V5fNWBGeGcRua3qakbLIiBqSBW026YovsKDl6hArIS0XMrhoZY8j574HTLp14R MC2vwOx96Ied0/Q89oIyGcx4tjjcPgGJMJRE0gby+khwiuNT7Os+Yi4PlQ6SlDg4kkIbbOKFV Frr9GngOkeXK1Lr6RXiC3t/FyBGOa8tUNaIkiFvRaBOQeH0n8tgCy2KM3b59Jy4VEfEfMWpjW wV2rsqnn6TaUQ9KuXOP9hdIznBKZkLO55JyB1U7ux5vmcMqrrPdSDGLsoBceMQ1Sa3OAwyz89 X+jLDW+0x1VyHG7g0IMyv9OXoABzkktjqdEVHOMeTTn+MUfBYEmuejC0otvkfU5a3PTojQC01 tNR8YeRTnR5svy8gFgIT3ecGQhSubBbPEDPRBdboqGSFrifNsgIGjvYTbJjh6WNhysVhff7LQ hDF4fIq2ZW8DOC4Z6cyaK/ujRrVKL4iy8nY9CTEq6OGEWt8J+OwiogCPKWJH3JjKAwc3t9Q5/ xwNUH6anyc3xPj+UaPbG2PN49Dod7zlOlgxjW3xEPEjE14h9OvZW/ltX5JcFmOlg6gx8TwsoB 1I7+E+15UjZrdVWv/KLfIi6p9FvMYOvWVxXvjyTRxFS5VI6SAIrbAPDB2ga1apudOB31m6PdT NJgGN19CE6uDItzDMcsfv7JX7ACtExgI/Aj61gnrA/FxDzhzvl+Cw4b6X65NOEqlQjVNMuRy3 WhK+MCPUsZ8FB5cjabCAm+Frt27wEC4frW5UMYFJwafcc0i/Pe+500/JJlhKoageOfLU76Ip5 D5tLB6FWJlIWbb9fvvMaLBiwzd1RRRsZEow6VGn1e+yMDmka2b/HR9d8hrPiyZLJT/W6UXaom CuhS3APLWBeWKhgBCrrF5IMCLKSXflxUDLVzzVQtw9WJt0wCw5zzD7PbsqqWp4VlJsHYQl8OW cvUV5mC31nUA6F1yT X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PJjh23Khz47Sq X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=JXPz0k8U; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of shoesoft@gmx.net designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shoesoft@gmx.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.15.0/25]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.37), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.19), asn: 8560(2.00), country: DE(-0.02)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[61.71.217.81.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[15.15.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmx.net.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.net]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[15.15.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[hotmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:25 -0000 On Thursday, May 14, 2020 1:24:17 AM CEST Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote= : > games/oneko was recently removed as it was marked broken due to being > unfetchable. I tried an old copy of the ports tree I had where it was > marked as such and `make fetch -DTRYBROKEN` succeeded. Was there an > error recorded for this and was it ever retested? Is this just a side > effect of having a failure and no maintainer? > If being removed as unfetchable, wouldn't a better MOVED entry be to > say it was unfetchable (for more than 6 months) instead of just broken > for more than 6 months? > Thanks for feedback I've recently asked myself the same question: multimedia/gpac-mp4box is flagged BROKEN=3Dunfetchable DEPRECATED=3DBroken for more than 6 months multimedia/gpac-libgpac uses the same distfile from the same mirror and is= not marked broken. I figured once a port is marked unfetchable, it will be deleted, even it i= s a transient failure. Of course, unless someone opens a bug report.