From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 14 20:52:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from maild.telia.com (maild.telia.com [194.22.190.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6485237B401 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:52:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by maild.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5F3qjA02972 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:52:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ertr1013.student.uu.se (h185n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.185]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA11622 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:52:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 74406 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Jun 2001 03:52:20 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:52:20 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Cynic Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSup questions Message-ID: <20010615055219.A73940@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: Cynic , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010615052040.03f5dba0@mail.cz> <5.1.0.14.2.20010615052040.03f5dba0@mail.cz> <01061511302605.00666@evilfry.dyndns.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010615055047.03f5dba0@mail.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010615055047.03f5dba0@mail.cz>; from cynic@mail.cz on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:54:58AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:54:58AM +0200, Cynic wrote: > well, that's the file I used. as I wrote, the file says > "the FreeBSD-current ports collection". > ^^^^^^^^ > now, my question is: is it ok, or have I done st similar to > updating userland and leaving kernel? won't there be any version > mismatches? you know, 4.3-RELEASE is a snapshot of the STABLE > branch, while CURRENT is the HEAD branch. I wouldn't bother > asking and would've cvsup'ed again from STABLE, but the note in > the handbook made me stop and ask. > It is ok. The ports collection is not split into different branches. Thus there is no -STABLE version of ports. Using the latest version of the ports-collection together with 4.3-RELEASE is perfectly fine. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message