Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:52:20 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Cynic <cynic@mail.cz> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSup questions Message-ID: <20010615055219.A73940@student.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010615055047.03f5dba0@mail.cz>; from cynic@mail.cz on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:54:58AM %2B0200 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010615052040.03f5dba0@mail.cz> <5.1.0.14.2.20010615052040.03f5dba0@mail.cz> <01061511302605.00666@evilfry.dyndns.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010615055047.03f5dba0@mail.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:54:58AM +0200, Cynic wrote: > well, that's the file I used. as I wrote, the file says > "the FreeBSD-current ports collection". > ^^^^^^^^ > now, my question is: is it ok, or have I done st similar to > updating userland and leaving kernel? won't there be any version > mismatches? you know, 4.3-RELEASE is a snapshot of the STABLE > branch, while CURRENT is the HEAD branch. I wouldn't bother > asking and would've cvsup'ed again from STABLE, but the note in > the handbook made me stop and ask. > It is ok. The ports collection is not split into different branches. Thus there is no -STABLE version of ports. Using the latest version of the ports-collection together with 4.3-RELEASE is perfectly fine. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615055219.A73940>