From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan 27 12:05:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA26726
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:05:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA26717
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:05:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA25794; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:05:10 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: PATCH: if_de.c #ifdef based version encoding 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jan 1998 18:24:46 GMT."
             <199801271824.LAA07024@usr01.primenet.com> 
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:05:10 -0800
Message-ID: <25790.885931510@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> When they are integrated, or rejected on the basis of failing a code
> review, then I will start believing that mechanism works.

And I have plenty of evidence to suggest that as bad as that mechanism
is, it works a whole lot better than sending patches off into the void
of -current, but whatever!

						Jordan