Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:24:20 +0100 (CET) From: wefa@nxcon.nexgo.lab.arcor.de (dont use that address) To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/25045: bind8 port doesnt remove/rename original named Message-ID: <200102122224.XAA84980@nxcon.nexgo.lab.arcor.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 25045 >Category: ports >Synopsis: the bind8 port leaves the original bind in place. >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 12 14:30:01 PST 2001 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Christoph Weber-Fahr >Release: FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE i386 >Organization: Mannesmann Arcor >Environment: nothing special. Ports collection cvsupped to today's version >Description: the bind8 port installs all its stuff in usr local, leaving the original bind stuff in place. it should at least tell you this. else you have two named etc in place, probably the new one will not get used at all. People have come to the point expecting the ports collection 'doing the right thing'. Here it doesn't >How-To-Repeat: install bind8 port (for, ahem, obvious reasons). Start named. Marvel. >Fix: ideal: rename all original bind files to %s.original put symlinks in their place to point to the new thing alternative: put some blurb into the Make install procedure warning the user about that >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102122224.XAA84980>