From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Apr 8 23:21:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB98727FCC0; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48yKyk5wQrz3JNP; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id A51ED1DD60; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:21:02 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Yuri Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r531147 - in head/net: . usockets usockets/files Message-ID: <20200408232102.GF76848@FreeBSD.org> References: <202004082101.038L1dCF094577@repo.freebsd.org> <20200408213218.GE76848@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 23:21:03 -0000 On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 02:48:47PM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 2020-04-08 14:32, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > I bet we need to have a symbolic link ${PREFIX}/lib/libusockets.so.0 to catch > > this library with ldconfig(8), right? > > No, having the file lib/libusockets.so in combination with USE_LDCONFIG=yes > should make libusockets.so discoverable by ldconfig(8). > > The unrelated problem with such library is that it lacks a SONAME because > the upstream didn't define it (they only build a static library). I'll ask > them to make a change on GitHub. Agree, it's better to have both static and shared objects for a library. Thanks for the update! -- Sergey