From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 28 11:00:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69FAC008C6 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9363A1C60 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CDu+DB79ThZREqySqGz7WqjF02TTcqHiiPqnQ4F1If4=; b=h2OVcWSAc3++oEj3/GX/MaW5v+ om7YehK4Oy80p8+Y4J8Hd96hQQqkqWdltx983olEsEbQ5mUXS5zJV0AYl2I4EidJT2HXuLCSM8bwB TNUx/w5SfUI6DlLuyb4Au2Bb6QhWPDjoSq939kpaeZvP2oO2f4+mpPmauI/QBTX0zq1g=; Received: from [114.121.233.1] (port=44410 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bpCbE-002fLc-A9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 05:00:28 -0600 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:00:22 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions Subject: Re: i386 version in future ? Message-ID: <20160928190022.5c06f809@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20160928105420.7b1d117f@moonstudio> References: <0D6BF663-5C95-4625-B412-00E14EF97986@FreeBSD.org> <35.AF.06698.BEF4AE75@dnvrco-oedge03> <20160927134158.74c11036@archlinux.localdomain> <20160928091109.7aa95c9d@moonstudio> <20160928105420.7b1d117f@moonstudio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Authenticated-Sender: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:30 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:54:20 +0200 Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:59:09 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >You are comparing different CPU brands with each other . > just take the last generation of plain 32-Bit-Atoms. They are really low power much less power hungry than e.g. an i7 of the same epoch. But it still is likely that the Atoms consume more energy to fulfil a specific task. With other words, it is a complex problem with no clear answer. Erich