Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:00:22 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: i386 version in future ? Message-ID: <20160928190022.5c06f809@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20160928105420.7b1d117f@moonstudio> References: <CANrxokEkYLY7uTv%2BnWy4K_iBeeaaCMraJmrNOD7cU2GXCWkNCA@mail.gmail.com> <0D6BF663-5C95-4625-B412-00E14EF97986@FreeBSD.org> <35.AF.06698.BEF4AE75@dnvrco-oedge03> <20160927134158.74c11036@archlinux.localdomain> <CAOgwaMuMfF7_zve%2BAMuJ8iiAD4wMXGUQDO4-j8Ck1B1FZ=NOXA@mail.gmail.com> <20160928091109.7aa95c9d@moonstudio> <CAOgwaMs_jRzvrnCxyD1i1z8S8Q4AzbpAGC0jGEp9Y-KwdqvbVA@mail.gmail.com> <20160928105420.7b1d117f@moonstudio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:54:20 +0200 Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:59:09 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >You are comparing different CPU brands with each other . > just take the last generation of plain 32-Bit-Atoms. They are really low power much less power hungry than e.g. an i7 of the same epoch. But it still is likely that the Atoms consume more energy to fulfil a specific task. With other words, it is a complex problem with no clear answer. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160928190022.5c06f809>