Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:02:56 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> To: Matt Olander <matt@offmyserver.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reply to V. Velox & questions about ``evangelism'' Message-ID: <20040117010256.GA90248@pasternak.w.lub.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040116173328.I91963@knight.ixsystems.net> References: <008001c3dc8a$624914a0$60d0fea9@workstation> <4008807B.5090105@sitetronics.com> <20040116162613.G91963@knight.ixsystems.net> <20040117000153.GA39482@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20040116173328.I91963@knight.ixsystems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Olander [Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:33:28PM -0800]: > good point. I've never tried it myself, but I've heard it's fairly cool > if you're going to use linux. they don't anywhere near 10,000 ports > though do they? I don't think so. Also, Portage is quite new technology (I am not saying it is immature, but well... everything needs to be throughly tested, doesn't it? :) Anyway, the point of my e-mail was, that as some more operating systems use Ports-like build systems, advocating FreeBSD using only this single argument misses the point.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040117010256.GA90248>