From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 6 9:20:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5C37BE67 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 09:20:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6B5C81C57; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:20:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:20:36 -0500 From: Bill Fumerola To: Edwin Kremer Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openssh question Message-ID: <20000306122036.I25438@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200003060833.AAA18027@windsor.research.att.com> <200003060920.CAA57713@harmony.village.org> <20000306112939.A24401@cs.uu.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000306112939.A24401@cs.uu.nl>; from edwin+freebsd-current@cs.uu.nl on Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:29:39AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:29:39AM +0100, Edwin Kremer wrote: > " I do not recommend use of OpenSSH (or SSH1 generally, for that matter). > > There hasn't been much followup on this. Anybody here who cares to > comment on this? What issues are relevant here and how bad is it? I'm sure he'd much prefer you use the version that puts money in his pocket. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message