Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:11:19 +0800
From:      "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To:        "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: New libpthread patch available.
Message-ID:  <002b01c30088$0b7d9e40$0701a8c0@tiger>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304111302390.19238-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you, I will test it.

My i386_gs.diff patch needn't be applied now,  because I have hacked =
vm_machdep.c
to load a correct %gs for upcall thread.  However %gs is not reloaded in =
set_context syscall
if someone want to reload it as well,  I think we needn't it, only need =
to keep an eye on it
if someone want to hack it.

David

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
Cc: <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 1:05 AM
Subject: New libpthread patch available.


> David,
>=20
> I fixed a couple of bugs and put another patch set up at the usual =
place:
>=20
>   http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/libpthread.diffs
>=20
> This seems to pass all but 10 or so of the 110 ACE tests.  I'll do =
some
> more testing with this and libc_r and post those results later.
>=20
> --=20
> Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002b01c30088$0b7d9e40$0701a8c0>