From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 28 16:40:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D40B16A4CE for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016B443FAF for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:40:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 0696E5309; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:40:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 099FB5308; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:39:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id CEB8333C8C; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:39:57 +0100 (CET) To: Zhang Shu References: <20031127183839.058F.ZHANG@koganei.wide.ad.jp> <7msmk9e237.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20031128103737.B752.ZHANG@koganei.wide.ad.jp> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:39:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031128103737.B752.ZHANG@koganei.wide.ad.jp> (Zhang Shu's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:43:53 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: Jun Kuriyama cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot process is too slow during installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:40:09 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:40:09 -0000 Zhang Shu writes: > When I install netbsd with the same floppy drive, it turns to be pretty > fast. So I guess this is a FreeBSD problem but do not know where it is... FreeBSD's boot code reads the disk sector by sector rather than track by track. Last time I brought this up I was told that "it doesn't matter on modern drives"... I wouldn't be surprised if track-by-track turns out to be 18 times faster than sector-by-sector with USB drives. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no