Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 13:12:51 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: config(8) moved to /usr/src/sys (was Re: Kernel rebuild quits ..) Message-ID: <199612222012.NAA01347@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199612221738.MAA07076@dyson.iquest.net> References: <199612221056.LAA13258@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199612221738.MAA07076@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John S. Dyson writes: > Once, long ago, a group of us had a disagreement that the config > sources should be part of the kernel tree (which I champion.) Maybe > this should be revisited -- since the config program *does* have > to have intimate knowedge of and actually *does* produce kernel > code (like genassym.) Mess-ups associated with bogus versions of > config have a possibility of being controlled then. I'm with you John! Go for it! Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612222012.NAA01347>