From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 8 3:34:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from citadel.cequrux.com (citadel.cequrux.com [192.96.22.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F1637B404 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 03:33:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by citadel.cequrux.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) id NAA08124; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:32:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: by citadel.cequrux.com via recvmail id 7886; Mon Jan 8 13:31:37 2001 Message-ID: <3A598CD5.CC26D681@cequrux.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 11:48:05 +0200 From: Graham Wheeler Organization: Cequrux Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Just how standard is APM? References: <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> <3A545615.3597BCF3@cequrux.com> <200101042234.f04MYM147333@harmony.village.org> <200101051755.f05Htpb55318@harmony.village.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> Graham Wheeler writes: > : Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe > : and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file). > > What's the failure mode? Is it enabled in the BIOS (I assume it is, > otherwise it wouldn't work in 'Doz). I suspect Mike is right when he says that the machine supports ACPI only, not APM. That would certainly explain what I observe. g. -- Dr Graham Wheeler E-mail: gram@cequrux.com Director, Research and Development WWW: http://www.cequrux.com CEQURUX Technologies Phone: +27(21)423-6065 Firewalls/VPN Specialists Fax: +27(21)424-3656 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message