From owner-freebsd-security Wed Sep 26 12: 0:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D9A37B426 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01222; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:00:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010926125837.04782100@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:00:11 -0600 To: Laurent Fabre , Will Andrews From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: LaBrea for BSD? Cc: FreeBSD Security In-Reply-To: <200109261414.QAA28606@malraux.matranet.com> References: <20010924162750.24311@shalmaneser.thelbane.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010925105333.04794430@localhost> <200109261355.PAA27232@malraux.matranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:18 AM 9/26/2001, Laurent Fabre wrote: >I'm writing a new version of it because i think this little >piece of code is a good idea but it also lacks features. >I want to be able to emulate stacks behaviors on a OS basis >and try to speed up a bit the capturing process. What API are you using to get to the interface? I would think that divert sockets would be best because they can selectively route packets of interest out to userland for processing. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message