From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 6 16:10:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42910657E6 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8638FC23 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n36GA6ml018201; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:10:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n36GA4Bd018186; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:10:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:10:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, modulok@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <200904061419.n36EJIsB047211@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: References: <200904061419.n36EJIsB047211@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: gmirror THEN geli, correct? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:10:27 -0000 > Modulok wrote: > > I'm looking for a confirmation on the order: When setting up a (root > > partiton) gmirror+geli, what is the propper order? e.g: gmirror the > > disks and THEN initialize geli on the /dev/mirror partitions? Is this yes it is right order. with geli then gmirror - you will end with double CPU load on writes (as data would be encrypted twice)