From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 5 13:44:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA27598 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 13:44:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from tellab5.lisle.tellabs.com (tellab5.lisle.tellabs.com [138.111.243.28]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA27592 Tue, 5 Mar 1996 13:44:42 -0800 (PST) From: mikebo@tellabs.com Received: from sunc210.tellabs.com by tellab5.lisle.tellabs.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #4) id m0tu4Wh-000jGLC; Tue, 5 Mar 96 15:44 CST Received: by sunc210.tellabs.com (SMI-8.6/1.9) id PAA02531; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 15:44:06 -0600 Message-Id: <199603052144.PAA02531@sunc210.tellabs.com> Subject: Re: Triton-II support... when? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 15:44:06 -0600 (CST) Cc: mikebo (Mike Borowiec), questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199603052047.NAA09028@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 5, 96 01:47:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert wrote: > > o Will FreeBSD 2.1-RELEASE boot/run on Triton-II main boards as-is? > > Will FreeBSD 2.1-RELEASE boot/run on a P5 without the floating point > bug? The question is basically a non-sequitur -- there is no function > difference in the chipsets except the Triton-II happens to work. > Are a lot of people running FreeBSD with their Level-2 caches off? > > FreeBSD supports the Triton chipset. Since the difference between the > I and II is the cache bug is fixed in the II, I can't see where fixing > a bug could make it not run. > As I understand it, there are much more profound changes than simply one bug fix. I've been told that Triton-II: o fixes a write-back cache bug o nominally speeds all memory accesses ~5% o adds support for concurrent PCI/ISA bus accesses o adds support for multi-processing o adds support for ECC memory Seems like a *lot* more functionality than can be accounted for by a simple bug fix, no? Perhaps Terry means Triton-II implements a superset of Triton-I functionality (plus the cache bug fix) so there's no reason existing kernel code would break? That's great... I thought perhaps there was more purpose to the chipset sensing code in /usr/src/sys/pci/pcisupport.c . - Mike -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Borowiec - mikebo@tellabs.com - Tellabs Operations Inc. Senior Member of Technical Staff 4951 Indiana Avenue, MS 63 708-512-8211 FAX: 708-512-7099 Lisle, IL 60532 USA --------------------------------------------------------------------------