From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 18 1:54:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (markm.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378E337B6DC for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 01:54:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00363; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:53:57 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200007180853.KAA00363@grimreaper.grondar.za> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really weak References: <7469.963903417@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <7469.963903417@critter.freebsd.dk> ; from Poul-Henning Kamp "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:56:57 +0200." Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:53:57 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> I ran a quick & dirty test here on some logfiles: that offset is > >> very close to white noise. > > > >With what amplitude? > > Depends on the termal environment of your xtal obviously :-) Help me here! :-) In your observed sample, what was the white noise amplitude? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message