From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 12 12:38:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6100F37B401; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C311643F93; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from melange (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3CJcTpw077562
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Message-ID: <0a4a01c3012b$18222be0$52557f42@errno.com>
From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <25785.1050175877@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:38:28 -0700
Organization: Errno Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:38:30 -0000

> >> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here,
> >> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future.
> >
> >Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o
> >consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did.
>
> I could maybe be persuaded that somebody might respond.
>
> I certainly cannot see why one would respond "as Nate did".
>
> At the very least I'd expect them to check the basic facts first.
>
> And as I have understood it, core@ would expect them to keep a
> a significantly less confrontational style than Nate did.
>
> But maybe that's just me...

Please don't trim my replies to change their intent.  My msg concluded with
the following:

"If you had noted that Ken had reviewed your changes I expect this never
would have happened.  Both parties are at fault here; consider the view from
the other side too."

    Sam