From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 22:35:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C7F16A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:35:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C143D54 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFA25DC6 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:35:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91110-01 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:35:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-50-112.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.50.112]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010555C0F for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:35:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4201559C.7080502@mac.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:35:08 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20050202210526.GC77499@keyslapper.net> <42014E0A.5070003@mac.com> <20050202221851.GE77499@keyslapper.net> In-Reply-To: <20050202221851.GE77499@keyslapper.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Subject: Re: xhost +localhost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:35:37 -0000 Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Don't shoot the messenger! :) Heh, sorry, that wasn't my intention. [ ... ] > It's probably not the only deprecation or interface change from 4.x. I > believe the 'nslookup' tool is now a wrapper to the 'host' utility, but > I never used either one in complex enough ways to see any > incompatibility. I can't quite remember, but I have the feeling there > was another gotcha I had to get used to going to 5.x. nslookup being depreciated was actually announced, and a version (or several?) which gave a warning to use something else but otherwise worked fine were released over the course of a year or two, and *then* the program got changed. -- -Chuck