From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 17 08:45:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 1319416A4E1; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82B216A4DA for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cdjones@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547BF43D45 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdjones@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7H8jhSN007138 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:43 GMT (envelope-from cdjones@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id k7H8jh3B007135 for perforce@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:43 GMT (envelope-from cdjones@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:43 GMT Message-Id: <200608170845.k7H8jh3B007135@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to cdjones@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Chris Jones To: Perforce Change Reviews Cc: Subject: PERFORCE change 104369 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:44 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=104369 Change 104369 by cdjones@cdjones-impulse on 2006/08/17 08:45:40 Remove lock order reversal, make skew formula vary with proportionate CPU usage and proportionate share allocation. Further tweaking required, and then actually hooking it into the priority-setting bit can be done. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2006/cdjones_jail/src/sys/kern/sched_hier.c#13 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2006/cdjones_jail/src/sys/kern/sched_hier.c#13 (text+ko) ==== @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ * everything out while we recalculate per-jail CPU usage. * TODO: this is excessively icky. */ + sx_slock(&allproc_lock); mtx_lock(&allprison_mtx); if (prisoncount) { LIST_FOREACH(pr, &allprison, pr_list) { @@ -457,7 +458,6 @@ pr->pr_estcpu = 0; } } - sx_slock(&allproc_lock); total_est_cpu = 0; FOREACH_PROC_IN_SYSTEM(p) { /* @@ -554,13 +554,13 @@ } /* end of ksegrp loop */ mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock); } /* end of process loop */ - sx_sunlock(&allproc_lock); if (prisoncount) { LIST_FOREACH(pr, &allprison, pr_list) { mtx_unlock(&pr->pr_mtx); } } mtx_unlock(&allprison_mtx); + sx_sunlock(&allproc_lock); } /* @@ -589,7 +589,6 @@ nShares = 0; nCpu = 0; LIST_FOREACH(pr, &allprison, pr_list) { - printf("schedcpu_thread: prison %p\n", &pr); nShares += pr->pr_sched_shares; nCpu += pr->pr_estcpu; } @@ -650,13 +649,19 @@ * soft limits available. Also, the amount of CPU time * reserved to unjailed processes really should be sysctl'd. */ - register unsigned int np = newpriority; - newpriority *= pr->pr_sched_shares; - KASSERT(0 != total_jail_sched_shares, - "no jail sched shares when a jail exists?!"); - newpriority /= 2*total_jail_sched_shares; - printf("resetpriority: reset KSE %p from %d to %d\n", - &kg, np, newpriority); + register unsigned int np = newpriority; + register unsigned int skew = PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE; + skew -= PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE; + skew /= 16; + + skew *= pr->pr_sched_shares; + skew *= pr->pr_estcpu; + /* avoid divide-by-zero hazards */ + skew /= max(total_jail_sched_shares, 1); + skew /= max(total_est_cpu, 1); + + printf("resetpriority: skewing KSE %p to %d from %d\n", + &kg, np + skew, np); } newpriority = min(max(newpriority, PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE), PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE);