From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 13:56:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3411D4DC8 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46T3Np0Pz6z3yk7; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AAA5133C26; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:56:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Pierre Dupond <76nemo76@gmx.ch> Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ping6 www.freebsd.org hangs References: <20190906192931.d5735e1602f98d6b9a2906c0@gmx.ch> <20190911122523.9b94cd45533279bf46592e94@gmx.ch> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:56:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190911122523.9b94cd45533279bf46592e94@gmx.ch> (Pierre Dupond's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:25:23 +0200") Message-ID: <44blvrhr6f.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46T3Np0Pz6z3yk7 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org has no SPF policy when checking 23.30.133.173) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.03 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.76)[-0.762,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.976,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ilk.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.ch]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ip: (0.15), ipnet: 23.30.0.0/15(0.42), asn: 7922(-1.49), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:56:58 -0000 Pierre Dupond <76nemo76@gmx.ch> writes: > Thanks for the tip. Finally I was able to reproduce the > problem (which arise from time to time). > > The ping6 command failed either with the IPv6 address (or > the name). The result is the same for an other address (like google) > but at the same time I can reach these address from other machines. > > It is also possible to reach (with ping6) the external router of my organisation > (passing few intermediate routers). > > What is curious however is that the command "traceroute6" succeed > and then the command "ping6" works again. > > It sounds like a strange fragmentation problem. By default traceroute uses UDP and ping uses ICMP. Could be a stateful firewall somewhere. You could test that by using ICMP with traceroute if it happens again.