From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 17:30:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C0A16A43B; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C2944A24; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFFF2096; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB012081; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 53A9533C8D; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:07 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin References: <200603281434.k2SEYmaR031447@repoman.freebsd.org> <200603281032.10624.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200603281032.10624.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:32:07 -0500") Message-ID: <86y7yuwn01.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include atomic.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:30:27 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 09:34, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Log: > > Use wrapper macros for atomic pointer operations in order to perform = the > > correct casts. This should probably be merged to other architectures. > It should really be uintptr_t rather than u_int. I realize that, but I wasn't sure I could safely assume that uintptr_t is defined - and by definition, at this point in the code, we know that u_int is compatible with a pointer. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no