Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:44:52 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK Message-ID: <20011026124451.B33751@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200110260736.f9Q7abh65198@gits.dyndns.org>; from clefevre@citeweb.net on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:36:37AM %2B0200 References: <20011025221626.I11022@buffoon.automagic.org> <200110260736.f9Q7abh65198@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > Joe Abley wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:44:25AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > [snip] > > > you always have the choice to use gawk from ports... > > > > Absolutely. I agree, and I would be happy to banish gawkisms from > > /usr/bin/awk. I'm just saying there is an existing population of > > scripts which begin "#!/usr/bin/awk -f" that may break, and that > > for that reason appropriate warnings should be given. > > forgot about that ! This would be easily fixed with NO_AWK and a devel/gawk port which could be built with PREFIX=/, no? G'luck, Peter -- This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026124451.B33751>