From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 20:14:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B5537B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alcatraz.wolfpaw.net (alcatraz.wolfpaw.net [204.209.44.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD60C43FBD for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin-lists@wolfpaw.net) Received: (qmail 12720 invoked by uid 0); 29 Apr 2003 03:13:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wolf) (216.123.201.128) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 03:13:49 -0000 From: "Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" To: Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <002701c30c7a$8cccc7c0$6401a8c0@bigblackhole> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Marvin RE: Best Way Blocking Spams X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:14:28 -0000 I agree.. and our spamassassin has a success rate of about 97% on spam messages. The failure rate (false tagging) is probably 1/1000. I personally can't see why you wouldn't just use SpamAssassin, but thats me.. Regards, Dale. -------------------------------- Dale Corse System Administrator Wolfpaw Services Inc. http://www.wolfpaw.net (780) 474-4095 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of RN Hosting > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 11:05 PM > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Marvin RE: Best Way Blocking Spams > > > Yikes, my jaw hit the floor when I saw the prices for Marvin. > > What makes it so much better than SpamAssassin that it's worth that > price? > > Personally, I don't see how a host could afford that and > why they would > want to pay a monthly fee with the availability of databases like > spamcop, GPL programs like SpamAssassin, Razor, > MailScanner, Bogofilter > etc. > > That costs more than all of my other overhead combined, per > domain that > I host. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:59:09 -0500 (CDT) > From: Adam Maloney > Subject: RE: Best Way Blocking Spams > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > This is somewhat of a shameless plug, but since it's on > topic I think > it's appropriate. > > We are a Minneapolis based ISP. We didn't like any of the current > solutions available, so we developed our own. It's similar > to Postini, > but we've put a lot of thought into it which makes it very > ISP-centric, > so I like it better. And it runs on FreeBSD. > > We have a specific pricing structure for service providers > who want to > provide it to their customers. > > It is a commercial solution, but if anyone is looking for > another "hands > off" approach like Troy mentioned, check http://marvin.sihope.com. > > > Adam Maloney > Systems Administrator > Sihope Communications > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >