From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 14 09:30:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA13124 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13084 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:30:26 GMT (envelope-from notwerk@calweb.com) Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA13917; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) X-SMTP: helo web1.calweb.com from notwerk@calweb.com server notwerk@web1.calweb.com ip 208.131.56.51 Received: (from notwerk@localhost) by web1.calweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA21304; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980414093014.59140@calweb.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:30:14 -0700 From: Giao Nguyen To: "Matthew D. Fuller" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I withdraw the fraggin question. References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: ; from Matthew D. Fuller on Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 11:07:45AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew D. Fuller said: > > Wonder if Linux is looking for any crazy, stupid ideas that might help > system functioning in some difficult cases... You'd get the same flames. The only difference is that you'd have different mail headers and the flavor of the flames will be different. Instead of coming from one coherent group, you'd get a bunch of disseparate flames coming at you and a few asking what "vi" is. Giao Nguyen -- If God had meant you to get it right the first time, He would not have put "alter table" into SQL. -- Philip Greenspun, "How to be a Web Whore Just Like Me" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message