From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 15:59:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07173106564A for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C76448FC1C for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26120 invoked by uid 0); 31 May 2010 15:59:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 May 2010 15:59:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=mrvBP9Bv2OtduNFKtXXS6xjc6eE5HQgABtnx4k2DAWCzAdyU04llVg1cMTuJ77h5U6iQ7MklnkF0ii+mzpcU1uH/u7hRUCCpnpX6kgMHeO4ehgdiNVXA2ar4lvOwkkwn; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ7OM-0004Fc-0s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:07 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:00 -0600 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:00 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100531155900.GA1417@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C01DD3F.3040000@a1poweruser.com> <871vct44ww.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20100530232827.GB97659@guilt.hydra> <87zkzgsllg.fsf@kobe.laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zkzgsllg.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:59:08 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:10:03AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:28:27 -0600, Chad Perrin wro= te: > >On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:31:59PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and > >> GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks. > > > > I'm not sure why you mentioned the size of Vim here as if it's a > > remarkably large piece of software. It *barely* doesn't fit on a 3.5" > > floppy when you use a full install of the console-based Vim editor. > > I'm pretty sure it's under 2 MB. >=20 > Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here: >=20 > keramida@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 5757731 1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 vim-li= te-7.2.344.tbz Does Vim install more than the binary? I've got this: > ls -l /usr/local/bin/vim -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1650340 Apr 18 12:20 /usr/local/bin/vim I don't think the size of the installation tarball is necessarily representative of the final size. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwD3MQACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWtaACeJdOZ8PVBRjuYwlSL0hyG/5Ep VKsAnj14pLd79p/+tNN1GWgsqvWbTx75 =OyGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--