From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org  Tue Mar  1 08:47:55 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A41ABBD86
 for <freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  1 Mar 2016 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: from phabric-backend.rbsd.freebsd.org (unknown
 [IPv6:2607:fc50:2000:101::1bb:73])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165AD1AF0
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: by phabric-backend.rbsd.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346)
 id 0EAFD3322319; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:47:55 +0000
To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
From: "mav (Alexander Motin)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-to: D5473+333+79492675d52ac1ab@reviews.freebsd.org
Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D5473: ATA/ATAPI6 device emulation in bhyve
Message-ID: <eaa9f0abc4307b61c1a88f29f524ddde@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-reviewers>, <differential-comment>
Thread-Topic: D5473: ATA/ATAPI6 device emulation in bhyve
X-Herald-Rules: none
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-upirdfykwaujxq3vuzqo>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-2monqlbk24m6mwkbdamf>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-fbdcs7ahjev7eqpeqr2a>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-4nfkmwndyskujbxjzjxc>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-tmsdq7z6rym2k7agm3fv>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-6ps3unnxvniqcn5kdjn5>
Precedence: bulk
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-2t5o3zrdohcj7mowtyki-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-2t5o3zrdohcj7mowtyki-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: ZmQ1YjBmNDNhNWVhZDYwNjJmNTU3Y2FmMjRkIFbVVzs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:47:55 -0000

mav added a comment.


  It was definitely significant amount of work, but I am not sure what motivation was behind it.  Why do we need it after already having much more featured AHCI-based ATA/ATAPI emulation? Are there any significant OS not supporting AHCI? There is significant amount of code duplication between implementations, plus this one obviously requires more work to be complete.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: iateaca, grehan, neel, tychon, mav
Cc: freebsd-virtualization-list